الثلاثاء، 18 يونيو 2019

Galaxy Note 10 launch date reportedly set for August 7

Samsung hasn’t officially confirmed the Galaxy Note 10 launch date as yet. However, a new report suggests that the company is going to unveil the device on August 7. The launch event will reportedly take place in New York City.

The venue is said to be the Barclays Center. That’s the same venue where Samsung launched the Galaxy Note 9 last year. It was already expected that this year’s flagship would also be unveiled in the month of August. There have been no reports to the contrary so far.

Galaxy Note 10 launch date might be August 7

If that is the case, we should be hearing an official confirmation from Samsung in the not too distant future. The company had confirmed on June 27 last year that the Galaxy Note 9 launch will take place on August 9, 2018.

Citing people familiar with the company’s plans, CNET reports that Samsung will be launching the Galaxy Note 10 during an Unpacked event at Barclays Center in Brooklyn on August 7. However, the report cautions that the plans could be changed since there’s still about two months to go until the event.

Even if the date is changed, it’s unlikely at this point in time that the launch would be delayed beyond August. There have been no rumors of a delayed launch at this point in time. So that’s not something which should be a concern for Galaxy Note fans.

Samsung is due to launch two models of the flagship phablet – the Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10 Pro. They’ll feature a 6.3-inch and 6.75-inch display respectively with a vertical camera system at the back. There’s also enough circumstantial evidence to believe that they might be the first phablets from Samsung to ditch the 3.5mm headphone jack.

If the Galaxy Note 10 launch date is indeed August 7, we should receive a confirmation from Samsung in about a week or so. Who’s excited?

The post Galaxy Note 10 launch date reportedly set for August 7 appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2WQfpnV
via IFTTT

[Poll] Does your Galaxy S10+’ pill-shaped screen cutout still bother you?

Galaxy fans weren’t happy when word got out that Samsung would be introducing notches to its smartphones. The Korean giant took a different approach by drilling a hole on the corner of the screen for the front camera, and the first Galaxy device with a punch-hole display cutout was the Galaxy A8s in late 2018, followed by the Galaxy S10e, Galaxy S10, and the Galaxy S10+.

Many complained about Samsung caving in to industry trends after having trolled the competition (mainly Apple) for putting notches on their phones. However, Samsung’s approach looked less obtrusive compared to the iPhone-like notch that was also adopted by companies like Huawei and OnePlus. Well, it looked less obtrusive on the Galaxy S10e and Galaxy S10. The Galaxy S10+’ display cutout is wider because it has two front-facing cameras, and it’s quite the eyesore when you first lay your eyes on it.

But it’s been more than three months since the Galaxy S10 trio went on sale, and it would be safe to assume that some Galaxy S10+ owners would have gotten used to that pill-shaped screen cutout by now. And we’d love to know if that’s actually the case, which is where this poll comes in: Does that pill-shaped cutout on your Galaxy S10+ still bother you? Have you learned to ignore it or at least be less concerned about its existence? Tell us by voting in the poll below, then take to the comments section to expand on your thoughts!

Does your Galaxy S10+' pill-shaped screen cutout still bother you?

The post [Poll] Does your Galaxy S10+’ pill-shaped screen cutout still bother you? appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/31DhpUe
via IFTTT

Galaxy Note 10 Pro might not have dual front cameras, and that’s okay

Earlier this month, Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10 Pro renders showed up for the first time, and they both had one thing in common: A single front camera placed in the center of the display. With the Galaxy S10+ sporting dual front cameras and the Galaxy S10 5G having four, many of us expected the Galaxy Note 10 Pro would have two front cameras at the very least. But it doesn’t look like that will be the case, and that’s probably a good thing.

Why? First off, the pill-shaped dual front camera cutout on the Galaxy S10+ looks rather ugly, and the three-camera setup on the 5G model looks even worse. Secondly, having a second camera doesn’t really make for substantially better bokeh selfies, as we had seen when we compared Live Focus selfies taken with a Galaxy S10e and an S10+. Well, there’s certainly some difference, but it’s not big enough to justify having to bear the sight of that pill-shaped cutout when you’re not taking selfies.

And with the Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10 Pro expected to have centered front camera cutouts, a dual camera setup is out of the question. However, the Galaxy Note 10 5G might have two front cameras, with the second one being a ToF (Time-of-Flight) sensor to enable background blur in videos and augmented reality experiences. At least that’s what we expect, especially after Samsung made a big deal about how 5G speeds will enable consumers to do more with the imaging prowess of the Galaxy S10 5G.

The Galaxy Note 10 is a couple of months away from launch, so it’s possible the actual product won’t be like the one we are seeing in all the leaks that are floating out there right now. But chances of that happening are slim if history is any guide. These leaks and rumors more often than not turn out to be accurate, and the Note 10 Pro is most likely going to have only a single selfie shooter like its less feature-packed sibling.

And that’s okay.

The post Galaxy Note 10 Pro might not have dual front cameras, and that’s okay appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2WMiN37
via IFTTT

Intel could turn to Samsung for 14nm Rocket Lake chip production

It seems that Samsung and Intel have been in talks for an arrangement which would see the Korean conglomerate manufacture the American semiconductor giant’s 14nm Rocket Lake chips. A report out of South Korea claims that the negotiations between both companies are now in the final stages.

Samsung has been trying to win new customers for its contract manufacturing business as it faces a slowdown in the memory chip market. The lack of demand has negatively impacted Samsung’s bottom line. The company wants to offset that by making more non-memory chips and also producing chips for clients like Qualcomm and possibly Intel.

Samsung may produce 14nm chips for Intel

A source cited in the report claims that “We know that the contract negotiations with Intel, which was only rumored, are in the final stages.” Samsung will reportedly begin mass production of Intel’s 14nm Rocket Lake chips in the fourth quarter of next year with the first Samsung-made CPUs hitting the market in 2021.

Intel has been dealing with a CPU supply shortage since the second half of 2018. It’s heavily invested in upgrading and setting up new lines for 10nm chip production but it would be a few years before it can scale them up. Intel has to keep its 14nm production yields up while it does that because it needs to put chips on the market. So it would be looking to offset some of that burden over to Samsung, which would gladly take it on for the right price.

With Samsung focused on finding new growth engines, it goes without saying that it will be looking to overtake TSMC as the top contract manufacturer for chips. Qualcomm has reportedly tapped Samsung to manufacture the Snapdragon 865 as well so that will help in pursuit of that aim.

Intel might be opting for Samsung because its competitor, AMD, is having all of its 7nm CPU and GPU parts produced at TSMC. Moreover, the Taiwanese company also continues to make chips, and the ongoing US ban on Huawei might have given Intel another reason to opt for Samsung.

Neither Samsung nor Intel have confirmed this arrangement but a public announcement would most likely be made when all the Is have been dotted and Ts crossed.

The post Intel could turn to Samsung for 14nm Rocket Lake chip production appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2In2juy
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy Fit e review: An affordable and bare-bones fitness band

While the tech world has been looking for the best smartwatch in recent years, fitness bands seem to appeal a lot more to the masses. Brands such as Fitbit and the like have proven that there is a substantial market for fitness bands, and Samsung is also playing in this segment. With the Galaxy Watch Active, Samsung has already put a beautiful fitness-focused smartwatch on the market, but a smartwatch is not a fitness band, which is why we also have the Galaxy Fit and Galaxy Fit e as part of Samsung’s 2019 lineup of wearable devices.

We were able to test the Galaxy Fit e for a couple of weeks, and this review will tell you if it’s a fitness band worth purchasing.

Galaxy Fit e review: Design and display

The Galaxy Fit e is the smaller of Samsung’s new fitness bands, with the ‘e’ short for essential, so you get only the essentials at a very reasonable price. When you see the Fit e for the first time, you can’t deny it looks a lot like the Mi Band from Xiaomi and the dozens of fitness trackers out there. Of course, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, as there’s not a lot of room to experiment with the design with such small devices.

The Fit e has a 0.74-inch PMOLED screen with a resolution of 64 x 128 pixels. That resolution is low enough that you can count the individual pixels, and the screen is also monochrome, so don’t expect any impressive graphics from this display. The screen gives you the needed information through text and images, which look clear but that’s about it. You cannot swipe on the display. You can double tap it to wake it up, and with a single tap you go to the next screen.

The single and double tap operation can be improved, as it took a while for us to get a hang of it and the display would not always respond on the first try. Thankfully, a software update fixed these touch issues, although there can still be a few instances where the band doesn’t properly respond.

Galaxy Fit e software and fitness tracking

Each screen on the Fit e has a widget, and you can determine which widgets and in what order you want to see them from the Galaxy Wearable app on your connected phone. You can select from calories, steps, heart rate, weather, and calendar widgets; the last one shows you a calendar entry that’s easy to read despite the low-resolution display. Naturally, you can also change watch faces, with a number of options that show different types of information.

The Galaxy Wearable app makes this small device a usable thing. You can set everything in the app – from the previously discussed watch faces and widgets to setting an alarm and more. Where you can do most stuff on a smartwatch without having to whip out your phone, the Galaxy Fit e puts the onus on the Galaxy Wearable app, and it more than met our expectations in this regard.

As far as activity tracking is concerned, the Fit e was rather accurate. On a 10K run, the distance reported by the band deviated by around 100-150 meters compared to what the Strava app reported on my phone. Sleep tracking looked accurate as well, but there’s no way to confirm that since the band simply registers movement and then uses that to give you an estimate of how solid sack time was. The Fit e also tracks your heart rate continuously when you’re exercising, but since its display isn’t very legible outdoors, checking your heart rate or your speed while you’re running is a bit hard to do.

Galaxy Fit e battery life

The Galaxy Fit e contains a 70 mAh battery that can last about a week. Exactly how long it will survive on a single charge will depend on how you use it, though. When you use the heart rate widget, the band continuously measures your heart rate, which can’t be disabled and costs a lot of power. The number of notifications you receive also affects battery life.

And there’s an annoying aspect that results from the Fit e’s dependence on the Galaxy Wearable app. The band does not tell you if the battery is running low. You have to see battery levels by checking out the app, and it would be great to see an update that adds a warning when the battery charge is low, as you can’t always keep checking your phone to see how much charge is left on the band.

Galaxy Fit e verdict

I kept the Fit e on my wrist day and night for a few weeks without noticing it was there, which shows how comfortable it is. It only weighs 15g so it’s not at all bothersome. I wore it while sleeping as well, although you’d want to turn off the wake-up gesture that lights up the screen when you raise your arm so that you’re not disturbed in the middle of the night. And while the Fit e is comfortable, you shouldn’t expect any miracles. It’s a good product for tracking basic activities like running, as befits a €39 fitness band, but if you’re looking for something more, you should look at the regular Galaxy Fit or the Galaxy Watch Active.

The post Samsung Galaxy Fit e review: An affordable and bare-bones fitness band appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2L3NKNY
via IFTTT

Leak shows the Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10 Pro size difference

The leaks keep on coming and the latest claims to show the Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10 Pro size difference, particularly in display size. It’s already known that Samsung will launch two models of its next flagship smartphone. The display size will vary and so might a handful of specs.

Other than that, the two Galaxy Note 10 models should look quite the same. They may also have the same power package under the hood. Both models will also have a separate 5G variant as well which will be available in markets with 5G networks.

Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10 Pro size difference

The difference in size is demonstrated by this protective film. According to @UniverseIce, they’re meant for the Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10 Pro, the shoddy spelling notwithstanding. The two models will feature a 6.3-inch and 6.75-inch display respectively. One can almost get a sense of just how massive the latter is going to be.

You might have noticed that the films don’t have cutouts for the front camera. That was also the case with another purported Galaxy Note 10 film that leaked last week. Apparently, dimensional data for the cutouts isn’t available as yet which is why these films are missing them. It’s believed that the Galaxy Note 10 may have a centered camera cutout while the Galaxy Note 10 Pro’s dual front camera would be positioned in the right corner.

A similar leak also hints at the screen edge curvature for the Galaxy Note 10. It doesn’t seem to be all that different from the Galaxy S10. An earlier leak has already suggested that the bezels on the next flagship will get a thorough trimming.

None of this is set in stone just yet. Samsung hasn’t dropped any hints about the Galaxy Note 10. We’ll have to make do with such leaks for now until something more substantial turns up.


The post Leak shows the Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10 Pro size difference appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2Knx44P
via IFTTT

Daily Deal: 37% off a leather wristband for the Galaxy Watch

If you’ve followed our deals, you might have noticed that we’ve found a lot of great deals for Samsung’s smartwatches. The wristband that comes with them might not be to year liking. You could either dislike the material or just the way it looks. Good thing these wristbands are interchangeable, meaning that you can buy more online, and replace them yourself. We’ve found these leather wristbands that give you a luxurious, classic look on your Samsung wearable device. This band is compatible with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 46mm, Gear S3 Classic, Frontier and the Galaxy Gear 2.

This leather band now comes with a 37% discount for just $11.99, so this is the right time to get it. Use the Buy Now button below to grab one while they’re still available!

The post Daily Deal: 37% off a leather wristband for the Galaxy Watch appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2N4vqa6
via IFTTT

Samsung files for Digital Bezel trademark, tickles imagination

With Samsung apparently having tried to develop a key-less design for the Galaxy Note 10, a recent trademark application caught our eye. In South Korea, the company has filed paperwork for the mark Digital Bezel.

Samsung Digital Bezel

Late last week, Samsung filed an application with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) for the trademark Digital Bezel. The application’s description is very broad, providing very little information about the device or application the mark applies to. That said, we can not help but be reminded of the alleged key-less design Samsung was testing for its upcoming Galaxy Note 10.

Back in March, we heard the first rumors about a next-generation Note device that no longer has physical hardware keys. Even only a few weeks ago, a similar report made the rounds, only to be debunked by two sets of renders showing a Galaxy Note 10 with traditional physical keys. Nevertheless, it is inevitable that Samsung will release devices in the future with pressure or touch sensitive keys replacing physical buttons. This is where we imagine a Digital Bezel comes in, being a bezel with such added functionality.

Of course, the key phrase here is ‘we imagine’. Samsung’s Digital Bezel might well turn out to be something else entirely. With the Note 10 actually having a normal bezel, we are not likely to find out more when that phone launches in August. For now, we’ll just file this under ‘things we are eager to learn more about’.

samsung digital bezel trademark

The post Samsung files for Digital Bezel trademark, tickles imagination appeared first on SamMobile.



from SamMobile http://bit.ly/2WNIxMH
via IFTTT

جميع الحقوق محفوظة لمدونة الغريب 2013